From: Jan Halborg Jensen [jhjensen@chem.ku.dk]
Sent: 7/18/2012
To: xxx@plos.org
Subject: Author Query to Editor PONE-D_12-07445R1
Hi,
Is there any news regarding this manuscript? It has been close to 6 weeks now.
Best regards, Jan
---------
On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:30 AM, plosone wrote:
Dear Dr. Jensen,
Thank you for contacting PLoS ONE.
I can confirm the reviews have been submitted and your manuscript is currently with the Academic Editor for a decision, as soon as the decision has been completed we will be in contact.
Kind Regards,
xxx
EO Staff
PLoS ONE
----------
From: Jan Halborg Jensen [jhjensen@chem.ku.dk]
Sent: 7/19/2012 1:47 AM
To: xxx@plos.org
Subject: Re: Case: 01158374 [ ref:_00DU0Ifis._500U04XUWc:ref ]
Thank you, but I got the following email from the editor. I am a little confused.
Dear Dr. Jensen:
The paper is still under review.
Sincerely,
xxx - Editor, PlosONE
----------
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 2:51 PM
To: Jan Halborg Jensen
Subject: Re: Case: 01158374 [ ref:_00DU0Ifis._500U04XUWc:ref ]
Dear Dr. Jensen,
Thank you for contacting PLoS ONE.
Please accept my apologies for any confusion caused by my previous email. In regards to your manuscript PONE-D-12-07445R1, I can confirm that the comments from two reviewers have been submitted. We are in contact with the Academic Editor who will soon be able to make a decision regarding your manuscript and inform you of his decision.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions or concerns.
Kind regards,
xxx
PLoS ONE Staff
--------
Update
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:11 PM
To: Jan Halborg Jensen
Subject: Status update for your submission to PLoS ONE: PONE-D-12-07445R1 [A Computational Methodology to Screen Activities of Enzyme Variants]
PONE-D-12-07445R1
A Computational Methodology to Screen Activities of Enzyme Variants
PLOS ONE
Dear Dr. Jensen,
I would like to take this opportunity to update you with regards to the current status of your manuscript as we are aware that it is taking longer than we anticipated for you to hear back from the peer review process of your submission.
Please accept my most sincere apologies for the delays you have experienced during the peer review process of your submission; whilst reviews have been received the Academic Editor would like to consult further in order to reach a decision.
Please rest assured that it is receiving our full and urgent attention. I know that this can be a frustrating process, but if I can ask for your continued patience whilst we are attempting a speedy resolution.
We appreciate your patience, and hope you will contact us if you have any questions or queries.
Regards,
xxx
Staff EO Lead
PLOS ONE
-------
Update 2
--------
Sent: 7/18/2012
To: xxx@plos.org
Subject: Author Query to Editor PONE-D_12-07445R1
Hi,
Is there any news regarding this manuscript? It has been close to 6 weeks now.
Best regards, Jan
---------
On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:30 AM, plosone wrote:
Dear Dr. Jensen,
Thank you for contacting PLoS ONE.
I can confirm the reviews have been submitted and your manuscript is currently with the Academic Editor for a decision, as soon as the decision has been completed we will be in contact.
Kind Regards,
xxx
EO Staff
PLoS ONE
----------
From: xxx
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 5:54 PM
To: Jan Halborg Jensen
Subject: Re: Author Query to Editor PONE-D_12-07445R1
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 5:54 PM
To: Jan Halborg Jensen
Subject: Re: Author Query to Editor PONE-D_12-07445R1
Dear Dr. Jensen:
The paper is still under review.
Sincerely,
xxx - Editor, PlosONE
--------
From: Jan Halborg Jensen [jhjensen@chem.ku.dk]
Sent: 7/19/2012 1:47 AM
To: xxx@plos.org
Subject: Re: Case: 01158374 [ ref:_00DU0Ifis._500U04XUWc:ref ]
Thank you, but I got the following email from the editor. I am a little confused.
Dear Dr. Jensen:
The paper is still under review.
Sincerely,
xxx - Editor, PlosONE
----------
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 2:51 PM
To: Jan Halborg Jensen
Subject: Re: Case: 01158374 [ ref:_00DU0Ifis._500U04XUWc:ref ]
Dear Dr. Jensen,
Thank you for contacting PLoS ONE.
Please accept my apologies for any confusion caused by my previous email. In regards to your manuscript PONE-D-12-07445R1, I can confirm that the comments from two reviewers have been submitted. We are in contact with the Academic Editor who will soon be able to make a decision regarding your manuscript and inform you of his decision.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions or concerns.
Kind regards,
xxx
PLoS ONE Staff
--------
Update
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:11 PM
To: Jan Halborg Jensen
Subject: Status update for your submission to PLoS ONE: PONE-D-12-07445R1 [A Computational Methodology to Screen Activities of Enzyme Variants]
PONE-D-12-07445R1
A Computational Methodology to Screen Activities of Enzyme Variants
PLOS ONE
Dear Dr. Jensen,
I would like to take this opportunity to update you with regards to the current status of your manuscript as we are aware that it is taking longer than we anticipated for you to hear back from the peer review process of your submission.
Please accept my most sincere apologies for the delays you have experienced during the peer review process of your submission; whilst reviews have been received the Academic Editor would like to consult further in order to reach a decision.
Please rest assured that it is receiving our full and urgent attention. I know that this can be a frustrating process, but if I can ask for your continued patience whilst we are attempting a speedy resolution.
We appreciate your patience, and hope you will contact us if you have any questions or queries.
Regards,
xxx
Staff EO Lead
PLOS ONE
-------
Update 2
From: Jan Halborg Jensen [jhjensen@chem.ku.dk]
Sent: 8/27/2012
To: plosone@plos.org
Subject: Author Query to Editor PONE-D-12-07445R1
Manuscript information:
========================
PONE-D-12-07445R1
A Computational Methodology to Screen Activities of Enzyme Variants
PLos ONE
========================
Dear Editor
Is there any news regarding this submission. If not, when can I expect to hear something?
Best regards, Jan
-----
From: xxx
Date: August 28, 2012 1:04:59 PM GMT+02:00
Subject: Re: Author Query to Editor PONE-D-12-07445R1
Dear Dr. Jensen,
I apologize for the delay in handling this manuscript. Your paper is still under review. You will hear from me within Sept. 15, 2012.
regards
xxxx
Associated Editor, PlosONE
------
From: no-reply@salesforce.com [no-reply@salesforce.com] on behalf of plosone [plosone@plos.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 11:10 PM
To: Jan Halborg Jensen
Subject: "Author Query to Editor PONE-D-12-07445R1" ref:_00DU0Ifis._500U04r2d9:ref
Dear Dr. Jensen,
Thank you for contacting PLOS ONE.
I can confirm that your manuscript is currently out for peer review. We are in contact with the Academic Editor and are working to ensure that the review continues to run smoothly. Please do not hesitate to contact us again if we may be of further assistance.
Kind Regards,
xxxxx
--------
From: Jan Halborg Jensen
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 1:49 PM
To: xxx
Subject: Re: Author Query to Editor PONE-D-12-07445R1
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 1:49 PM
To: xxx
Subject: Re: Author Query to Editor PONE-D-12-07445R1
Dear xxx
What is your decision regarding our manuscript?
Best regards, Jan
----
From: xxx
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 4:28 PM
To: Jan Halborg Jensen
Subject: Re: Author Query to Editor PONE-D-12-07445R1
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 4:28 PM
To: Jan Halborg Jensen
Subject: Re: Author Query to Editor PONE-D-12-07445R1
Dear Jan
thanks for your message. I still need few days more to get the last referee report and then I will get back to you.
Regards
xxx
----
The reviews arrived on September 24th. You can read the rest here. Tl;dr: the paper is now accepted
No comments:
Post a Comment